<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Bush fighting Nazis and Communists?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stewartburch.wordpress.com/2006/09/02/president-bush-fighting-nazis-and-communists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stewartburch.wordpress.com/2006/09/02/president-bush-fighting-nazis-and-communists/</link>
	<description>This is about taxation.  This is about the federal deficit. This is about out of control politicians.  I have a solution that is out of the box, take a deep breath here we go...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:25:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rockshooter</title>
		<link>http://stewartburch.wordpress.com/2006/09/02/president-bush-fighting-nazis-and-communists/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>rockshooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://stewartburch.wordpress.com/2006/09/02/president-bush-fighting-nazis-and-communists/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Ah yes. The ex-military genius who states his limited military knowledge but goes ahead with the detailed analysis and the condemnation, without a cure, anyway.

Yep. Regardless of how they vote, one can always spot a weak-kneed liberal when they pop their wind sucking head up out of the grass long enough to wave their yellow flag of cowardice.

Mr Burch, try making the military decisions that effect an ongoing operation based on secret military intelligence without giving away protected zones of source, all while idiots like you (and better qualified idiots, with real media jobs) hash out every word you utter.

Is there any wonder Mr Bush has a whole staff of trusted professionals help him “speak his mind?”

And, which is it, Mr Burch, “Get out of Iraq, or stay and obtain peace through victory?” There is no middle ground.

Geesh, Stewart, one would think that you were never in Viet Nam at all.

Now, the really powerful thing that you wrote was to clean house. I can’t argue with that. In that, you and I are not only in the same boat, we each are operating an oar and are hopefully rowing in the right direction.

I long ago gave up the idea that I had the luxury of voting my conscience. There are so many good men out there who could do a great job presidenting, but they are unelectable because, as you know, in our current form of election, one needs means and a consensus in order to run. And these elements do not come cheap.

What’s the answer? And, please notice the negative space under this question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes. The ex-military genius who states his limited military knowledge but goes ahead with the detailed analysis and the condemnation, without a cure, anyway.</p>
<p>Yep. Regardless of how they vote, one can always spot a weak-kneed liberal when they pop their wind sucking head up out of the grass long enough to wave their yellow flag of cowardice.</p>
<p>Mr Burch, try making the military decisions that effect an ongoing operation based on secret military intelligence without giving away protected zones of source, all while idiots like you (and better qualified idiots, with real media jobs) hash out every word you utter.</p>
<p>Is there any wonder Mr Bush has a whole staff of trusted professionals help him “speak his mind?”</p>
<p>And, which is it, Mr Burch, “Get out of Iraq, or stay and obtain peace through victory?” There is no middle ground.</p>
<p>Geesh, Stewart, one would think that you were never in Viet Nam at all.</p>
<p>Now, the really powerful thing that you wrote was to clean house. I can’t argue with that. In that, you and I are not only in the same boat, we each are operating an oar and are hopefully rowing in the right direction.</p>
<p>I long ago gave up the idea that I had the luxury of voting my conscience. There are so many good men out there who could do a great job presidenting, but they are unelectable because, as you know, in our current form of election, one needs means and a consensus in order to run. And these elements do not come cheap.</p>
<p>What’s the answer? And, please notice the negative space under this question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
